AI Growth Exposes Gaps in Governance and Readiness 

New research shows AI adoption is accelerating, but many organizations still face governance, compliance, and readiness challenges.

Écrit par
Ken Underhill
Ken Underhill
May 29, 2026
3 minute read
eSecurity Planet Le contenu et les recommandations de produits sont indépendants de la rédaction. Nous pouvons gagner de l'argent lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers nos partenaires. En savoir plus

Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption continues to grow across industries, but new research from Veeam suggests many organizations are still working through the governance, security, and operational challenges associated with deploying AI at scale.

The study, which surveyed 300 technology and business leaders across financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, and technology sectors, found that 95% of organizations have already deployed AI in some capacity. 

However, respondents also reported a range of challenges related to governance, compliance, workforce skills, and implementation.

“AI adoption is advancing faster than data safeguards, and many companies have gaps they can’t pinpoint (or aren’t aware of) that prevent them from governing AI safely and achieving the ROI business leaders expect,” said Brad Linch, Director of Enterprise Strategy at Veeam in an email to eSecurityPlanet.

He added, “Today, C-level executives and boards still lack established metrics and common language to decide on what to do next, impeding their ability to scale AI safely.” 

Key Takeaways of the AI Report

  • 95% of surveyed organizations have deployed AI, but many continue to face governance, compliance, and operational challenges.
  • More than half (52%) of respondents scaled back at least one AI initiative, while 40% experienced delays and 28% discontinued a project entirely.
  • Talent shortages (43%) were the most frequently cited barrier to AI adoption, followed by integration challenges (33%) and regulatory uncertainty (25%).
  • Executive confidence remains high, with 80% expressing confidence in scaling AI, yet nearly half said that confidence is based more on intuition than measurable evidence.
  • Only 31% of organizations have completed a regulatory review or audit involving AI, highlighting ongoing gaps in governance and accountability.

AI Adoption Is Growing, but Challenges Remain 

Nearly seven in ten respondents said AI is embedded across multiple business functions or plays a central role in their organization’s strategy. 

Advertisement

At the same time, more than half (52%) reported that at least one AI initiative had been scaled back during the past 18 months, while 40% experienced project delays and 28% said an AI initiative had been discontinued entirely.

According to the research, organizations cited talent shortages in AI and machine learning expertise (43%) as the most common obstacle, followed by difficulties integrating AI into existing workflows and systems (33%). 

Regulatory uncertainty (25%), data quality concerns (20%), and explainability challenges (19%) were also identified as factors affecting AI initiatives.

The findings indicate that while AI deployment is becoming increasingly common, many organizations continue to address foundational issues related to governance, accountability, and data management as adoption expands.

Confidence Often Outpaces Evidence 

Executive confidence in AI readiness remains high despite these challenges. 

Approximately 80% of surveyed leaders said they are confident in their organization’s ability to scale AI over the next two years. 

However, the study found that nearly half of respondents based that confidence more on intuition than on measurable evidence. 

Among organizations with formal AI plans, confidence was most commonly associated with governance frameworks (55%), executive support (55%), and dedicated AI risk functions (53%).

The research also identified a gap between having governance policies in place and demonstrating compliance. 

Nearly nine in ten organizations reported having formal AI governance policies, yet only about one-third said they could immediately provide comprehensive audit evidence if requested. 

Most respondents indicated that the information exists but would require significant effort to assemble.

Governance and Accountability Remain Key Challenges 

The report found that only 31% of organizations had completed a regulatory review or audit involving AI, while 20% reported benchmarking their AI programs against industry peers. 

These findings suggest that many organizations are still developing processes for measuring and validating the effectiveness of their governance and oversight efforts.

Overall, the research suggests that organizations reporting the fewest challenges tend to have more established governance, accountability, and data management practices. 

Advertisement

As AI adoption continues to expand, many organizations are balancing deployment efforts with the need to address operational, compliance, and risk management considerations.

As AI initiatives continue to scale, zero trust is being incorporated into AI governance and security strategies to help organizations validate access, protect sensitive data, and improve accountability. 

Ken Underhill

Ken Underhill is an award-winning cybersecurity professional, bestselling author, and seasoned IT professional. He holds a graduate degree in cybersecurity and information assurance from Western Governors University and brings years of hands-on experience to the field.

eSecurity Planet Logo

eSecurity Planet is a leading resource for IT professionals at large enterprises who are actively researching cybersecurity vendors and latest trends. eSecurity Planet focuses on providing instruction for how to approach common security challenges, as well as informational deep-dives about advanced cybersecurity topics.

Propriété de TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Tous droits réservés

Divulgation publicitaire : Certains des produits qui apparaissent sur ce site proviennent d'entreprises dont TechnologyAdvice reçoit une compensation. Cette compensation peut influencer la façon dont les produits apparaissent sur ce site, notamment l'ordre dans lequel ils apparaissent. TechnologyAdvice n'inclut pas toutes les entreprises ou tous les types de produits disponibles sur le marché.