SCO Group Tuesday confirmed that it was the victim of a
denial of service (DoS) attack Friday, and said it is investigating the
possibility of a link between the attack and its lawsuit against IBM for alleged intellectual property violations.
“SCO is vigorously investigating the source of the attack and the identity
of the perpetrators,” said company spokesman Blake Stowell. “This attack
came within 48 hours of IBM’s response to SCO’s lawsuit against IBM
alleging intellectual property infringement. Given this close proximity in
time, we are carefully examining whether a link exists between SCO’s legal
action and some of the Linux community who are hostile toward SCO for
asserting its legal rights.”
Lindon, Utah-based SCO has raised hackles in the Linux community after it
sued IBM for allegedly misusing trade secrets after IBM walked away from a
joint project with SCO which sought to create an Intel Itanium version of
SCO’s UnixWare. IBM scrapped the effort, dubbed Project Monterey, when it
decided to focus its attention on Linux rather than Unix. But SCO
maintained that IBM’s rapid strides with Linux were built on trade secrets
it garnered from Project Monterey — especially the integration of Unix
System V libraries with Linux, which allows the Linux platform to run many
Unix applications. SCO is suing IBM for $1 billion.
SCO said the DoS attack occurred at about 10 a.m. Mountain Time, and that
it gobbled up about 90 percent of the available bandwidth of its service
provider for the entire Lindon, Utah backbone. The company said it
contacted a special agent for Intrusion Detection at the FBI Cyber Crimes
Division in Salt Lake City, and the special agent is now analyzing
information on the attacks. The U.S. Attorney’s office is also
investigating the attack.
SCO said its ISP has identified 138 different machines that were an
intermediate source of the bot or worm which triggered the attack, but has
not yet been able to confirm the identity of the original source.
“A denial of service attack is a serious criminal violation,” Stowell said.
“Cyber terrorism hurts a business as much as any other crime involving the
destruction of property. Unfortunately, some programmers who disagree with
SCO’s corporate policies have ignored the seriousness of cyber terrorism.
This was a mistake on the part of the people involved, because we will
prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and will do everything
possible to assure that justice is done for the commission of this crime.”