Representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Trade Commission, America Online, e-mail security service Postini, and e-mail service provider Digital Impact and Consumers Union testified at the hearing. Ronald Scelson, who claims to comply with CAN-SPAM but was once a proud spammer, also testified. Its purpose was to examine the effectiveness of the CAN-SPAM Act, which became law in January of this year.
Opinions were mixed, though overall the comments tended to suggest that five months into its implementation, the act is not an unqualified success. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the chairman of the committee, cited a Pew Internet & American Life Project survey released in March that found 77 percent of e-mail users are receiving the same amount of spam or more since CAN-SPAM was passed.
In contrast, Ted Leonsis, vice chairman of America Online, said substantial progress has been made in fighting spam and ''there has been a downward trend in the amount of spam in AOL members' inboxes.''https://o1.qnsr.com/log/p.gif?;n=203;c=204650394;s=9477;x=7936;f=201801171506010;u=j;z=TIMESTAMP;a=20392931;e=i Leonsis mentioned spam-fighting efforts undertaken under the auspices of the act including the filing of the first major industry lawsuits under the CAN-SPAM Act in March by AOL and fellow ISP giants EarthLink, Microsoft and Yahoo!
In a theme echoed by other players who testified at the hearing, Leonsis mentioned the difficulty of identifying spammers. ''In order to radically reduce spam, we must know who the senders are.'' In that direction, Leonsis said, AOL is working on a number of technological initiatives.
The Federal Trade Commission has formed a special task force of federal and state enforcers to fight spam, Timothy Muris, the FTC's chairman, said in testimony.
The task force is co-sponsored by the FTC and the Attorney General of Washington. It has 136 members representing 36 states, several units within the Department of Justice, and the FTC. The FTC trains task force members in investigative techniques for tracking spammers. It also has monthly conference calls on spam trends, technologies, investigative techniques, targets and cases, Muris said.
Muris also noted that the FTC sought public comments from interested parties on a plan and timetable for establishing a national Do Not E-Mail registry. ''The staff has held meetings on the record with more than 80 interested parties representing more than 60 organizations to explore all aspects of the concept from as many viewpoints as possible,'' Muris testified.
The CAN-SPAM Act has increased law enforcement interest in pursuing spam-related cases, according to Jana Monroe, assistant director of the Cyber Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Before the act was implemented, enforcement ''lacked the legal tools to address the spam problem directly,'' she said.
''To date, the CAN-SPAM Act has had no substantial impact on the flow of spam,'' said Shinya Akamine, president and CEO of e-mail security firm Postini. ''In the four months since CAN-SPAM went into effect, spam has increased from 78 to 83 percent of the messages processed by Postini.''
The CEO said CAN-SPAM is a good law, he said, but ''most spammers are criminals who are unconcerned about breaking the law.'' He touted spam-blocking offerings like those of his company as the solution.