Is Your Free AV a System Hog?

Share it on Twitter  
Share it on Facebook  
Share it on Google+
Share it on Linked in  

The effectiveness of malware detection, how well it catches infections, is the chief characteristic to consider when choosing an antivirus program. But resource consumption, how much system resources it uses, is also important. This is especially true on older machines where heavy duty usage by your AV software can bog down the system and make it crawl when running scans.

In a previous article, A Guide to Free Antivirus Software, I reviewed four different free antivirus programs from Avast, Comodo, AVG, and Microsoft. I looked at the security features of each. Now, I am reviewing the resource consumption of the same four programs.

Here I discuss the system requirements, download sizes, and the installation process. I also share the average physical memory (RAM) and processor (CPU) usage I saw while testing. Lastly, I discuss any performance settings that can help control the resource consumption.

avast! Free Antivirus 6 - avast! Free Antivirus 6 supports Windows 2000 Pro SP4, XP SP2 or SP3, Windows Vista, and 7. It requires at least a Pentium III processor with 128MB of RAM and 200MB of free hard disk space.

The install file is fairly large at 56.2MB, but no additional downloads are required. The installation took only about three minutes, included an initial quick scan, and didn’t even require a reboot. After the install, it quickly updated the virus definitions.

Here are the memory usage numbers I saw for the two running avast processes:

  • Avastui.exe (avast! Antivirus) 6,044K
  • AvastSvc.exe (avast! Service) 14,442K and 37,042K during scanning

While idle, the total memory usage was around 20,486K. During the quick scan I ran, the total increased to about 43,086K, and CPU usage was about 5 percent to 15 percent. It took 11 minutes and scanned 25,625 items.

In the settings I found a couple resource control features. In the scanning settings, you can choose a scan priority: High (default), Normal, or Low. The higher the priority, the more system resources it will use. I also found avast uses a caching feature to help speed up real-time and manual scans. It does this by not rescanning files previously marked as safe until a reboot or a virus definition update.


avast fig 1

I also found two useful scan scheduling settings for laptops: you can enable it to not start if running on batteries and pause if you begin to use batteries.


avast fig 2

COMODO Internet Security 5.5 - COMODO Internet Security (CIS) supports Windows XP SP2 or higher, Vista, and 7. It requires 128 MB of RAM and 350MB of free disk space.

The download file at 59.7MB was the biggest of those I reviewed, but I didn’t have to do any further downloading during the install. Like avast, the installation only took about three minutes and didn’t require a reboot. But it did require a 10 minute update process, including a 142MB download.

Here is memory usage numbers I saw for the four running processes:

  • Cfp.exe (COMODO Internet Security) 8,904K
  • Cmdagent.exe (COMODO Internet Security) 10,592K and 52,616K during scanning
  • Clps.exe (COMODO GeekBuddy) 27,520K
  • Clpsls.exe (COMODO livePCsupport Service) 2,876K

While idle these add up to 49,892K of memory usage. They recommend a full scan after install, but they also offer a critical areas scan, which is what I ran. During the six minutes it took to scan 201,909 items, the memory usage was very sporadic but averaged around 91,916K and 5 percent to70 percent CPU usage.

Keep in mind, the bottom two processes in the list above are for the optional GeekBuddy service COMODO provides. This is included in the install by default but you can easily opt out of it during the installation. If you do, you’ll see a reduction in resource consumption. For instance, I saw memory usage around 19,496K at idle and 61,520K while scanning.

Unlike with the other programs, I didn’t find any settings in CIS to limit CPU or resource usage.


AVG Anti-Virus Free 2012 - AVG Anti-Virus Free 2012 supports Windows XP, Vista, and 7. It requires an Intel Pentium 1.5 GHz or faster process with 512 MB of RAM and a whopping 950 MB of free disk space.

The initial download file was a meager 3.71MB, but an additional 53.7MB was downloaded during the install. After the eight minute installation, a reboot wasn’t required. But it took another two minutes to analyze and update, including a 65.8MB virus definition update.

I was surprised to see 10 processes for AVG:

  •  avgui.exe (AVG User Interface) 11,280K
  • avgwdsvc.exe  (AVG Watchdog Service) 13,200K
  • avgtray.exe (AVG Tray Monitor) 9,784K
  • avgnsx.exe (AVG Online Shield Service) 236K
  • avgidsagent.exe (AVG Identity Protection Service) 12,816K
  • vprot.exe (VProtect Application for SafeSearch) 6,528K
  • sidebar.exe (to run the desktop gadget) 10,644K
  • avgrsx.exe (AVG Resident Shield Service) 400K and 15,500K during scanning
  • avgcsrvx.exe (AVG Scanning Core Module – Server Part) 336K and 7,000K during scanning
  • avgscanx.exe (AVG Command-line Scanning Utility) 9,716 K during scanning only

Sitting at idle these totaled about 65,224K of memory usage. During the whole computer scan I ran (a quick scan isn’t offered), the total memory usage increased to around 96,704K with CPU usage 10 percent to 20 percent. It took 68 minutes to scan 1,030,702 items.

In the scanning settings I found you can adjust how quickly each scan type completes. The faster it scans, the more system resources it uses. You can specify the speed (low, medium, and high) or it can automatically adjust itself depending upon available resources.


AVG 2012

Microsoft Security Essentials - Lastly, I reviewed Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) version 2.1. It supports Windows XP SP3 with a 500 MHz or higher processor and 256 MB of RAM. It supports Windows Vista SP1 or SP2 and Windows 7 with a 1.0 GHz or higher processor and 1 GB of RAM. For all versions, it requires 200 MB of free disk space.

The download file was a small 7.69MB with a quick 25 second download. The installation only took about three minutes, but then required a reboot. Though the virus definition update itself was small and quick, it took a few minutes for it to automatically update and activate the real-time protection.

I saw just three running processes for MSE:

  • Msseces.exe (Microsoft Security Client User Interface) 13,480K
  • NisSrv.exe (Microsoft Network Inspection System) 2,300K
  • MsMpEng.exe (Antimalware Service Executable) 60,564K and 65,000K during scanning

At idle, the three processes were using about 76,344K of memory. During the quick scan, it only increased to 80,780K and the CPU usage ranged 15 percent to 25 percent, which took about 10 minutes and scanned 7600 items.

In the settings you can set the max CPU usage during scans from 10 percent to 100 percent (50 percent is the default). You can also set it to only start a scheduled scan when the computer is not in use.



The Results

Out of the four programs I reviewed, avast! Free Antivirus 6 had the lowest resource consumption. COMODO Internet Security 5.5 was close in regards to the memory usage, but had the most sporadic and highest CPU usage. AVG Anti-Virus Free 2012 and Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) are in a fairly close tie between the worst in consumption. AVG had a lower idle memory usage, but a higher scanning usage than MSE.

When choosing an antivirus program you’ll also want to take other things, like features, into consideration rather than just the resource consumption. COMODO and avast provide the most features, with COMODO offering slightly more due to the integrated firewall. AVG and MSE offer about the same amount of basic protection, but AVG gives you more customization options. Also keep in mind, if your computer is for business use you’re limited to using either Comodo Internet Security Microsoft Security Essentials.

Eric Geier is the founder of NoWiresSecurity, which helps businesses easily protect their Wi-Fi networks with the Enterprise mode of WPA/WPA2 security. He is also a freelance tech writer. Become a Twitter follower or use the RSS feed to keep up with his writings.



Loading Comments...