NotPetya Cyber Attacks Point to a Need for Comprehensive Risk Management

Earlier this week, Ukrainian police seized servers belonging to accounting software provider Intellect Service as part of an investigation into last month’s massive NotPetya ransomware attack, which hit the country’s government, transport systems, banks and power utilities. Intellect Service’s M.E.Doc accounting software is used by about 80 percent of companies in the Ukraine, according to […]

執筆者
Jeff Goldman
Jeff Goldman
Published: Jul 7, 2017
Updated: Aug 16, 2022
3 minute read
eSecurity Planet のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Earlier this week, Ukrainian police seized servers belonging to accounting software provider Intellect Service as part of an investigation into last month’s massive NotPetya ransomware attack, which hit the country’s government, transport systems, banks and power utilities.

Intellect Service’s M.E.Doc accounting software is used by about 80 percent of companies in the Ukraine, according to Reuters.

Intelligence officials and security companies have traced the initial infections to an M.E.Doc software update — Reuters reports that investigators say the attack was planned months in advance by skilled hackers who had planted a vulnerability in M.E.Doc’s software.

“During our research, we identified a very stealthy and cunning backdoor that was injected by attackers into one of M.E.Doc’s legitimate modules,” ESET malware researcher Anton Cherepanov wrote in an analysis of the attack. “It seems very unlikely that attackers could do this without access to M.E.Doc’s source code.”

Crucially, Cherepanov noted, NotPetya wasn’t typical ransomware — it was masquerading as ransomware in order to disguise its actual intention. “In fact, the malware authors’ intention was to cause damage, so they did all that they could to make data decryption very unlikely,” he wrote.

Closing the Back Door

Despite earlier denials that a back door had been inserted into its software, Intellect Service chief executive Olesya Bilousova told Reuters on Wednesday, “Yes, there was. And the fact is that this back door needs to be closed.”

Bilousova said any computer on the same network as one using M.E.Doc is now vulnerable. “We need to pay the most attention to those computers which weren’t affected by [the NotPetya attack],” she said. “The virus is on them waiting for a signal. There are fingerprints on computers which didn’t even use our product.”

Dmytro Shymkiv, deputy head of the Presidential Administration of Ukraine, told Reuters that Intellect Services’ servers hadn’t been updated since 2013. “Worrying is a very light word for this,” he said. “How many back doors are still open? We don’t know.”

In a separate post, ESET’s Cherepanov identified the attackers responsible for NotPetya as members of the TeleBots group, which was responsible for a series of similar attacks in Ukraine, and has connections with the BlackEnergy group that was behind power outages in western Ukraine in December of 2015.

Advertisement

Last weekend, Ukranian intelligence officials claimed that Russian security services were responsible for the attack.

A Need for Risk Management

CyberGRX CEO Fred Kneip told eSecurity Planet that understanding which third parties pose a threat to your organization is one of the most pressing challenges security teams now face. “M.E.Doc is likely just one of hundreds or thousands of third parties that most organizations impacted by this breach were tasked with tracking,” he said.

“While even the most thorough risk assessment can’t guarantee there’s no malware inside a vendor’s network, it can uncover red flags pointing to weak security controls that leave it vulnerable,” Kneip added. “This would allow organizations to work with a vendor like M.E.Doc to mitigate potential vulnerabilities before they are exploited.”

As the number and complexity of cyber attacks expand, the need for cybersecurity risk management continues to grow. Still, a recent NetWrix survey of 723 IT professionals found that 87 percent of organizations don’t use any software for information security governance or risk management.

Just 25 percent of respondents at large enterprises and 26 percent of those at SMBs said they feel prepared to beat cyber risks. “Even though large organizations are believed to have significant resources for maintaining security, they are no less vulnerable than SMBs when it comes to actual IT risks,” Netwrix CEO and co-founder Michael Fimin said in a statement.

Jeff Goldman

eSecurity Planet contributor Jeff Goldman has been a technology journalist for more than 20 years and an eSecurity Planet writer since 2009. He's also written extensively about wireless and broadband infrastructure and semiconductor engineering. He started his career at MTV, but soon decided that technology writing was a more promising path.

eSecurity Planet Logo

eSecurity Planet is a leading resource for IT professionals at large enterprises who are actively researching cybersecurity vendors and latest trends. eSecurity Planet focuses on providing instruction for how to approach common security challenges, as well as informational deep-dives about advanced cybersecurity topics.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。